Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Sigma 100-300mm f/4 EX DG APO HSM


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

Poll: Rate this lens (1 member(s) have cast votes)

Rate this lens

  1. 1 Star - appalling (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2 Stars - below average (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 3 Stars - average (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. 4 Stars - above average (1 votes [100.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

  5. 5 Stars - outstanding (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Dallas

Dallas

    Founding Editor & Developer

  • Administrators
  • 14,665 posts
  • LocationSouth Africa
  • Edit my pics?:Yes

Posted 06 September 2010 - 18:14

If you have used this lens, please share your experiences with the community by posting about them as a reply to this topic. This topic will be indexed on our "Other Lenses" page. You may post sample images taken with the lens.

Please don't ask questions pertaining to the lens on this thread, rather ask in the Lenses board.

Fotozones.com - non-commercial forum all about mirrorless camera systems

 

We have 2 suites available for our Ultimate Big 5 Safari at Sabi Sabi this August. Contact me for details! 

 

Win an olympus OM-D E-M5 & ThinkTank Mirrorless Mover


#2 SlingingGlass

SlingingGlass
  • Life Member
  • 280 posts
  • LocationNorth Texas or wherever I wake up!

Posted 19 September 2010 - 05:38

Used it indoors and out on a D40 (manually), 14Nx, and F5.  The only other tele I've ever used was the 70-200m VR (1st gen) and that was only on my '40 & 14.  The Nikon was faster, noticeably but not by very very much.  The color was better with the 70-200 on the 40 but pretty much the same, as far I could tell anyway, on the 14Nx and the 'real raw' F5.  Had a little flare with it when getting right near bright sun.  Just a slight touch of ghosting too, polarizer maybe would have probably helped too but I didn't have a 82mm one at the time.  Its a little on the heavy side but I love it for a street lens.  Yeah if I had the money I'd probably like something like a 300mm VR F/2.8, but I don't.  And I don't mind it a bit.  Used it for outdoor portraits with no problems.  Great for indoor sports and on a dx like a 90 or 300 it would probably be great for your kids outdoor soccer/football/softball etc games.  Not bad for the grand I spent on it from keh, I'm happy.
sg 
I would submit one can see no further than the distance from one's optic nerve to one's retina, everything else is a reflection waiting to happen.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users